We don't use them for advertising or retargeting, but to make your browsing easier (for example, to watch our live shows, we need you to accept Youtube cookies). That's all we do.
We use Matomo with anonymized audience tracking and that's cool.
The storage or technical access is strictly necessary for the purpose of legitimate interest to enable the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Technical access or storage is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences not requested by the subscriber or Internet user.
Storage or technical access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
Technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. In the absence of a subpoena, voluntary compliance by your Internet service provider, or additional records from a third party, the information stored or retrieved for this sole purpose generally cannot be used to identify you.
The storage or technical access is necessary to create user profiles to send advertisements, or to track the user across a website or multiple websites for similar marketing purposes.
4 réponses
Interesting infographic on RWD in emailing. I really liked the one from Sarbacane on the same subject.
A question not directly related to RWD but I read a post about the interest /possibility of embedding html5 videos directly without emails with the development of smartphone playback.
Is this a good idea?
Hello Laurent,
Concerning HTML5 video in emails, it is indeed possible in some cases. Nevertheless, it remains a delicate exercise, so it is important to test well and to be well informed about the display environment of your subscribers.
See you soon,
Jonathan
Lo,
there is one point that bothers me, with this "responsive" fashion ....
Everyone talks about it, everyone says "it's great, we have to go through it"... But...
From my "little" experience, it doesn't really work "everywhere".
hotmail/outlook : remove all background-css : not practical for responsive...
gmail : deletion of css, so out the @media-queries, there the same, a responsive that wants to be "real", and that looks like something is not possible.
outlook 2007+: the best of the best, which does not support much, and with which you have to "play" at the tables.
So my question: how can we announce that the responsive works? if not by "cheating" and generating a table with 100% with divs that will "maybe" be placed where we think, and especially, with an email, which will not be the same from one platform to another...
I have had requests to make responsive email with different design depending on whether the view is desktop, tablet or smartphone and ... for now I have not found a solution ...
Hello Pierre-Emmanuel,
Indeed, the situation is not simple. On the other hand, what you consider as cheating is in the end the way to go, a succession of tinkering to satisfy everyone (or more or less).
I recommend that you read or re-read this article on acceptable degradation: https://www.badsender.com/2013/11/04/design-emailing-degradation-acceptable/
See you soon,
Jonathan